VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2015 › High Court of Delhi

Baby Harman Jot Kaur (Minor) Thr. Her Natural Guardian/Mother Gagan Deep v. Sarvjeet Singh

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 September 2015
Bench
S.P.Gargauthor
Case no.
CRL.REV.P. 35/2015

Judgment

Crl.R.P.35/2015 $-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

DECIDED ON : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2015

+

CRL.REV.P. 35/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.842/15

BABY HARMAN JOT KAUR (MINOR) THR. HER NATURAL

GUARDIAN/MOTHER GAGAN DEEP

..... Petitioner

Through : Mr.Sumit K.Khatri, Advocate.

versus

SARVJEET SINGH

..... Respondent

Through : Mr.R.S.Juneja, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.Garg, J. (Oral)

¶1Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 15.12.2014 of learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, whereby the respondent was directed to pay interim maintenance @ `2,400/- per month to the petitioner. The revision petition is contested by the respondent.

¶2During the course of arguments, it was agreed by both the parties that the interim maintenance being paid to the petitioner @ `2,400/- per month shall be enhanced to `4,000/- per month till the disposal of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. on merits w.e.f.

Crl.R.P.35/2015

01.07.2015. This is without prejudice to the rights of the parties and would have no impact on merits of the case.

¶3In view of the above settlement, without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the impugned order dated 15.12.2014 is modified to the extent that the interim maintenance shall be `4,000/- per month till the disposal of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. w.e.f. 01.07.2015. This is without prejudice to the rights of the parties and would have no impact on merits of the case.

¶4The revision petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶5Trial Court record (if any) along with copy of the order be sent back immediately.

(S.P.GARG) JUDGE

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 / tr

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.