Vineet Kumar v. Sandhya and Ors

O R D E R %

19.11.2024

¶1The petitioner challenges the order dated 13.01.2023 pursuant to which the petitioner was directed to pay an ad interim maintenance for a sum of ₹6,000/- per month to Respondent No.1 and a sum of ₹4,000/- per month to Respondent No.2, who are admittedly the wife and minor child of the petitioner.

¶2By order dated 13.01.2023, the petitioner was directed to pay the maintenance amount and the matter was listed for arguments on interim maintenance.

¶3Nothing has been brought on record to indicate what transpired after the matter was adjourned on 13.01.2023. The order dated 13.01.2023 indicates that the parties were to be subsequently heard on the issue of interim maintenance. Thus, the impugned order was only an ad interim order which is not This is a digitally signed order. revisable in terms of Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.

¶4The petition is, therefore, dismissed. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024 'Aman' This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 490/2023, CRL.M.A. 11637/2023 & CRL.M.A. 15799/2024 VINEET KUMAR .......Petitioner Through: Mr. Saroj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Revisionist (Through V.C.). versus SANDHYA AND ORS .......Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Tawra, Advocate for Respondent No.2 & 3 (Through V.C.). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN