- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 May 2023
- Bench
- Dinesh Kumar Sharma
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1931/2022
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Judgment
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)
¶1The present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of FIR No. 110/2008 registered under sections 135/438 Indian Elec. Act (Amed) 2003 at PS Harsh Vihar.
¶2Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was lodged on the basis of complaint lodged by Respondent No.2 wherein it is stated that on 24.08.2007 an inspection took place on the basis of which allegations of electricity theft were made against the petitioner.
¶3Chargesheet has not been filed.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of proceedings the matter has already been settled between the parties and thus the Present FIR maybe quashed along with all the other proceedings emanating therefrom.
¶5As per the settlement the initial theft of electricity bill of Rs.5,16,290/- was reduced to Rs.2,58,145/-. The petitioner paid the said amount after which The BSES has also issued 'No Dues Certificate' and also sent a communication to the SHO, PS Harsh Vihar that the matter has been settled.
¶6Learned counsel for BSES submits that the matter has already been settled.
¶7It has been repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this court that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings or the complaint or the FIR as the case may be.
¶8In view of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances and taking the case FIR No. 110/2008 registered under sections 135/438 Indian Elec. Act (Amed) 2003 at PS Harsh Vihar along with all the other proceedings emanating therefrom is quashed.
¶9The present petition stands disposed of.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J MAY 10, 2023 Pallavi
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RAKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Khairun Nisa, Adv. with petitioner. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OFNCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.. Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Anjali Rathi, PS Harsh Vihar. Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra and Mr. Sanjeet Kr. Trivedi, Advs. % Date of Decision:10th May, 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.