Lakhi Ram v. UOI & Anr

ORDER % 02,06.2011

¶1The instant appeals pertain to lands situated in the revenue estate of village Ghevra, and the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 with which I am concerned was issued on 6.2.2003.

¶2The Reference Court has assessed the compensation @ n,18,367/- besides other statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894.

¶3Deciding a batch of appeals lead matter being LA.APP % No.489/2008 Chiranii La! Vs. UP! & Ann today itself, with reference to a decision dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench deciding LA.APP.No.193/2006 Pratao Sinah (through LRs) Vs. UP! & Ors. I have determined the fair mari<et value of the lands in village Ghevra at ?4,03,425/- per bigha as of 6.2.2003.

¶4The appeals stand disposed of decreeing the same enhancing the compensation payable to the appellants @?4,03,425/- per bigha; additionally decreed that the appellants would be entitled to the statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 including the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 93 (2001) DLT 569 Sunder Vs. Union ofIndia.

¶5The appellants would also be entitled to proportionate costs.

¶6Pending applications, if any, in the appeals stand disposed of in terms of the prayer made in the application.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. June 2, 2011 dk

$-24-33, 35-39, 67-71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + LA.APP.24/2009 RAJ SINGH & ORS. UOI & ANR. LA.APP.25/2009 CHOTU & ANR. UOI & ANR. LA.APP.34/2009 SHRI BRAHMA UOI & ANR. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndranI Appellants Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. + + LA.APP.36/2009 RISHl RAJ RANA& ANR. Appellants UOl & ANR. LA.APP.47/2009 M.P.GUPTA UOI & ANR. LA.APP.48/2009 RAGHUBIR SINGH UOI & ANR. LA.APP.55/2009 Mr.Ashlsh Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Taklar, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Ashlsh Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR. Appellants UOI & ANR. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, LA.APP.56/2009 M.P.GUPTA & SONS Versus .Appellants Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, + LA.APP.57/2009 MEHAR SINGH & ORS. .Appellants Versus + LA.APP.58/2009 SANJEEV TUSHIR Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, .Appellants Versus UOl & ORS. + LA.APP.127/2009 JAI NARAYAN & ORS Versus UOl & ANR. + LA.APP.85/2009 LAKH I RAM Versus UOl & ANR. + LA.APP.78/2009 GURDEV SINGH Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UO! Ms.Indrani .Appellants Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOl Ms.Indrani .Appellant V . Versus + LA.APP.77/2009 RAJ SINGH (D)THRU LRS .Appellants Versus + LA.APP.76/2009 NISHA GUPTA Versus LA.APP.340/2010 RATTAN SINGH Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. .Appellant Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. I; UOI &ORS. LA.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants Mr.Kuideep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Mr.Ashlsh Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. LA.APP.342/2010 RAGHUBIR SINGH + LA.APP.343/2010 ANGOORI & ORS. Mr.Kuideep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Appellants Mr.Kuideep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. m k UNION OF INDIA &ORS. Mr.Sanjay Poddar. Advocate, Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. LA.APP.344/2010 HEM CHANDERSHARMADECD. THRLRs Mr.KuIdeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. '< j Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: ^ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEPNANDRAJOG •