- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 November 2011
- Bench
- V.K. Shali
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 423/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow V.K. Shali
Judgment
ORDER %
01.11.2011
¶1The learned counsel for the petitioners seel<s permission to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file afresh urging some additional grounds.
¶2The learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no.l does not have any objection.
¶3In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NOVEMBER 01, 2011 RN V.K. SHALI,J Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
n/ -T r * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 423/2011, CRLM.C. 429/2011, CRLM.C. 424/2011, CRLM.C. 425/2011, CRLM.C. 426/2011, CRLM.C. 427/2011 & CRLM.C. 428/2011 AJAY DALAL & ORS. Petitioners Througii Mr.K.L.Janjani with Ms.Vandana, Advs. versus THOMAS COOK INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondents Through Mr.S.Luthra, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Devina Sehgal, Advs. for respondent no.l. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.