- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 November 2011
- Bench
- V.K. Shali
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 425/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow V.K. Shali
Judgment
ORDER o1.11.2011 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file afresh urging some additional grounds. The learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no'1 does not have anY objection. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. v.K. sHl\Lr,J NOVEMBER 01,2011 RN olo
1.
2.
¶3, Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-19 to 25 *INTHEHIGHcoURToFDELHIATNEWDELHI + CRL.M.C' 423/2oIt, cRL.M.c. 429/2gtt, CRL.M.C. 424/2oIL, CRL. tvt.C. 425iZOu, Cnl.vt .C. 426/2011, CRL.M.C. 42712011 & cRL.M.C. 428 /20Lt AJAY DALAL * o*?;roush Advs. ..... Petitioners Mr.K.L.Janjani with Ms'Vandana, VCTSUS THOMAS COOK INDIA LTD. & ORS' ""' Respondents Through Mr.S.Luthra, Sr.Adv' with Ms'Devina Sehgal, Advs. for resPondent no'1' CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.