VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

Shiv Nath Rai Harnarain (India) Ltd v. Abdul Ghffar A.Rehman

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 September 2008
Bench
Rajiv Sahai Endlawauthor
Case no.
O.M.P. 300/2001

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.01.2017

¶1Adjournment is sought on behalf of the counsel for the plaintiff / petitioner.

¶2The same is opposed by the senior counsel for the defendants / respondents contending that the applications of the defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC in the suit and for release of monies deposited in the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 are for consideration.

CS(OS) 2554/2008 & O.M.P. 300/2001

¶3Mr. Vishal K. Panwar, though advocate on record in both the proceedings, on behalf of the plaintiff / petitioner states that Mr. Davinder N. Grover is the main counsel and is in personal difficulty and thus could not brief the senior counsel.

¶4However Mr. Vishal K. Panwar inspite of prodding is unable to disclose any reason.

¶5Personal difficulty can also be engagement in another brief.

¶6In this view of the matter and since the senior counsel appears for the defendants / respondents, today"s adjournment is granted subject to payment of cost of Rs.50,000/- in each of the matters by the plaintiff / petitioner to the counsel for the defendants /respondents before the next date of hearing.

¶7List on 7th March, 2017.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J JANUARY 11, 2017 "gsr"..

CS(OS) 2554/2008 & O.M.P. 300/2001

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2554/2008 & IA No.9251/2009 (u/O VII R-11 CPC) LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vishal K. Panwar & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Mehta, Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Mr. Sumer Sandhu, Ms. L. Jamin & Ms. Diviya Rajkhowa, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 300/2001 & IA No.8552/2010 (u/S 151 CPC) SHIV NATH RAI HARNARAIN (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal K. Panwar & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR ABDUL REHMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Mehta, Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Mr. Sumer Sandhu, Ms. L. Jamin & Ms. Diviya Rajkhowa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.