Mohd. Umar Farooq v. Nupur Begum

ORDER o/o

18.10.2010 The matter was passed over on the first call as none was present on behalf of the petitioner. Same is the position even on the second call. The statement of account has also not been filed by the petitioner in terms of the order dated 16.09.2010. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution, alongwith the pending application. HIMA KOHLI,J OCTOBER 18, 2010 rkb Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 57/2009 and CrLM.A. 1268/2009 MOHD. UMAR FAROOQ Petitioner Ttirough: None versus . NUPUR BEGUI^I Respondent Througin: Mr. K.K. Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE |V1S. JUSTICE HII^IA KOHLI