VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Mr Saurabh Singh v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Madhu Jainauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1401/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 25/2024, registered at Cyber Police Station, Outer North, Delhi, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC'), and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶3Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶4The petitioner is present before this Court. Respondent no. 2 who is present through video conferencing has been identified by his counsel and the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶5Brief facts of the case are that the present FIR came to be registered on the complaint of respondent No. 2 alleging that he was defrauded of an amount of Rs. 17,224/- through an online financial transaction. The said amount was transferred through UPI pursuant to representations allegedly made by unknown persons regarding his insurance policy.

¶6During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes. The petitioner has returned the entire disputed amount of Rs. 17,224/- to respondent No. 2 and the parties have entered into a Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 18.12.2025.

¶7On a query made by this Court, respondent No. 2, who has been identified by the Investigating Officer, has categorically stated that the settlement has been entered into by him out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or undue influence. He further states that he has received the entire settled amount and has no objection if the present FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶8In view of the aforesaid settlement between the parties, the nature of the dispute, the fact that the entire amount has been repaid to respondent No. 2 and the statement made by respondent No. 2 before this Court, no useful purpose would be served by continuing the criminal proceedings. Continuation of the proceedings would, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, amount to an abuse of the process of law. It would thus be in the interest of justice to quash the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶9Accordingly, FIR No. 25/2024, registered at Cyber Police Station, Outer North, Delhi, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

¶10The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

¶11Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Trial Court for necessary action and compliance.

¶12The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 24, 2026/b/P The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010188742026 + W.P.(CRL) 1401/2026 MR SAURABH SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Mr. Utkarsh and Mr. Harsh Nayak, Advs. Petitioner-in-person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advs. SI Vishal, PS Cyber, Outer North Delhi. Respondent no.2-in-person (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.