Mukul Kumar v. Union of India and Anr

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶1Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs: "a.) directing the respondents to modify the result dated

12.04.2023 and that of the petitioner as informed on

04.05.2023;

b.) directing the respondents to get the correctness of the question examined from independent subject expert;

c.) directing the respondents to give the details of the last selected candidates in EWS category;

d.) directing the respondents to re-examine the case of the petitioners for the vacancies for post of HC(RO) if remains unfilled after any of the selected candidate does not join."

¶2After hearing learned counsel for the parties in brief, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present

W.P.(C) 6680/2023

petition as a representation of the petitioner, and the same shall be decided by the Board of Officers within six weeks from today with a reasoned order.

¶3The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

¶4As agreed by the counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, the report of the Board of Officers shall be final and binding on the petitioner.

¶5Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications is disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE

MAY 18, 2023 S.Sharma

W.P.(C) 6680/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18th May, 2023 + W.P.(C) 6680/2023 & CM APPLs. 26146/2023, 26147/2023 MUKUL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kaushik, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav & Ms. Arushi Kapoor, Advocates. Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law) BSF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA