VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Mr Ashwin Jayasankar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
19 August 2026
Bench
Madhu Jainauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 2406/2025

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Madhu Jain

Judgment

O R D E R %

19.08.2026

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2By way of the present petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS') read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.P.C.'), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 203/2019, registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi, for the offences punishable under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC'), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶3Issue Notice. Learned APP for the state accepts notice on behalf of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. state.

¶4The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and the Investigating Officer (IO) concerned.

¶5The FIR was registered at the instance of Respondent No.2 against the Petitioner pursuant to a dispute arising out of a misunderstanding between the parties.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 04.03.2024, the parties agreed to settle all their disputes for a total sum of Rs. 7,50,000/-. He submits that the balance amount of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) has been handed over to Respondent No.2 today in Court by way of Demand Draft bearing No. 004662. It is further submitted that, with the said payment, the terms and conditions of the settlement stand fully complied with and nothing further remains to be paid by either party under the settlement.

¶7On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise, vide Settlement Agreement dated 04.03.2024, out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

¶8In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶9Accordingly, FIR No. 203/2019, registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi, for the offences punishable under Section 354A of IPC, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby quashed.

¶10The present petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶11Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned learned Trial Court for necessary action and compliance.

¶12The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 19, 2026/b/rm The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010193952025 + CRL.M.C. 2406/2025 MR ASHWIN JAYASANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Imbisaat Liyaqat, Adv. Petitioner-in-person (through VC) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP Mr. Sunchet Khanna, Adv. for R2. Respondent no.2-in-person SI Ekta, PS IGI Airport. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.