Manvi Makhijani v. Prateik Dadlani

O R D E R %

13.11.2024

¶1After making brief submissions, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, confines his prayer to the extent of allowing the cross-examination of the petitioner to be conducted through video conferencing mode.

¶2The aforesaid submission is not opposed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

¶3In view of the aforesaid, no directions on transfer of the petition, as such are required. In case the petitioner approaches the Trial Court with the prayer for allowing the cross examination of the petitioner through video conferencing mode, the Court below shall consider the aforementioned prayer in accordance with extant rules.

¶4Consequently, with the aforesaid observations and liberty, the instant This is a digitally signed order. transfer petition along with pending application stands disposed of.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024/MJ This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 58/2024 & CM APPL. 21535/2024 MANVI MAKHIJANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Prateek Goswami, Mr.Shashank Goswami and Ms.Nancy Goswami, Advs. versus PRATEIK DADLANI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, Ms.Sakshi Chandna and Ms.Somyashree, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV