Sanapala Janardhana Rao v. Union of India & Ors

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶1The petitioner in his petition has made following prayer: a) To quash and set aside the Order dated

06.10.2022. b) To direct the respondents to issue NOC to the petitioner subsequent to his selection with the Railways as Commercial Cum Ticket Clerk along with all consequential benefits. c) To direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to resign from service.

¶2Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that for the NOC,

W.P.(C) 7131/2023

the petitioner made a representation, however, the same was rejected by the respondents. He further submits that his case is covered by the various judgements mentioned in the writ petition.

¶3This Court put a specific query to the learned counsel for the petitioner that whether in the representation, the judgements have been mentioned. His reply is in negative.

¶4Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present writ petition as reprentation and decide the same within four weeks from today.

¶5The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

¶6Needless to say that if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision so taken, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE

MAY 23, 2023/PA

W.P.(C) 7131/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 23.05.2023 + W.P.(C) 7131/2023 and CM APPL. 27776/2023 SANAPALA JANARDHANA RAO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam and Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Ms. Prerna Dhall, GP, Ms. Tesu Gupta and Ms. Ayushi Garg, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA