Home Credit India B.V v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2 1 1, International Taxation New Delhi & Anr

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM No.28776/2023

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7397/2023 & CM No.28775/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief]

¶2Issue notice.

2.1 Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/revenue.

¶3Given the directions that we propose to issue, Mr Kumar says that he does not wish to file a counter-affidavit in the matter, and he will argue the

matter based on the record presently available with the court.

3.1 Therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal at this stage itself.

¶4This writ petition concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20.

¶5Mr Sachit Jolly, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, has drawn our attention to the notice dated 04.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "Act"].

5.1 It is Mr Jolly's contention that the notice had been issued without application of mind. In this context, Mr Jolly has broadly made the following submissions:

(i) First, the allegation concerns investment in shares and, as correctly put by him, at this stage, it could not have been said, without material on record, that it would constitute income chargeable to tax, which had escaped assessment.

(ii) Second, the notice seeks a copy of the passport reflecting travel details. Once again, Mr Jolly correctly states that the petitioner, i.e., the notice, is a company, therefore, this information could not have been sought from it.

(iii) Third, the Assessing Officer (AO) also asked for a tax residency certificate and, therefore, it appears he is completely unclear whether he is issuing notice to an individual or a corporate entity.

(iv) Fourth, to a query concerning applicability of Section 50CA , Mr Jolly submits that this provision applies to transfer of shares, and not investment in shares.

¶6We have put these aspects to Mr Kumar. Mr Kumar says that the best

way forward would be to remit the matter to the AO, to conduct a de novo exercise.

¶7We tend to agree with Mr Kumar.

¶8Accordingly, the impugned notice and order are set aside.

¶9Liberty is, however, given to the AO to recommence the proceeding, if deemed necessary, albeit, after gathering the relevant material which would show that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment qua the petitioner.

¶10In case, the AO deems it fit to recommence the proceeding, he/she will issue notice to the petitioner.

¶11The AO will also, in that event, accord personal hearing to the authorized representative of the petitioner.

¶12Needless to add, in such a situation, the AO will pass a speaking order; a copy of which will be furnished to the petitioner.

¶13The writ petition is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

¶14Consequently, the pending application shall stand closed.

¶15Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

MAY 26, 2023

aj

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 26.05.2023 + W.P.(C) 7397/2023 & CM Nos.28775-76/2023 HOME CREDIT INDIA B.V. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sachit Jolly, Ms Disha Jham and Ms Soumya Singh, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 1 1, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]