Arjun Singh and Ors v. Union of India and Ors

J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 28854/2023 (Seeking Exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶2The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 7412/2023

¶3Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioners are similarly situated and cover in the judgment rendered by this Court in W.P. (C) 3343/2023 and W.P.(C) 3453/2023.

¶4We note that while rejecting the representation of the petitioners it is mentioned in paragraph 4 that the said judgment is applicable only to those petitioners who are party in the Writ Petitions, but that is not the legal

W.P.(C) 7412/2023

position.

¶5Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to extend the benefit given in the above said petitions to the petitioners in the present petition also if they are similarly situated candidates.

¶6To this effect necessary order shall be passed by the respondents within six weeks from now.

¶7Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that some incorrect details are mentioned in the petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit the correct information to the respondents within one week and thereafter, the respondents shall take decision within six weeks.

¶8The petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE

MAY 26, 2023 va

W.P.(C) 7412/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 26th May, 2023 + W.P.(C) 7412/2023 ARJUN SINGH AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Central govt. Counsel with Mr. Kabir Kumar Hazarika G.P. and Mr. Anshul Bhadouria, Advocate and Sh. Hemendra Singh DC, Law, BSF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA