VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2023 › High Court of Delhi

Ruby Kasana v. Manjeet Singh

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
29 May 2023
Bench
Sanjeev Sachdevaauthor, Manoj Jain
Case no.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 162/2023

Judgment

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL.29259/2023 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 162/2023 & CM APPL. 29258/2023 (stay)

¶1Appellant impugns order dated 11.05.2023 whereby the application filed by the appellant under Order IX Rule 7 CPC seeking setting aside of ex-parte order dated 07.05.2022 has been dismissed.

¶2Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant had requested her counsel to be diligent in the matter. However, he did not file any written statement. She submits that the respondent has not paid the litigation expenses and has also not even complied with the order for payment of maintenance.

¶3Issue notice. Mr. V.S. Dubey, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶4With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for consideration today.

¶5No doubt the record reveals that several opportunities were taken by the appellant to file written statement and for seeking setting aside of the order but these were not availed. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, since the respondent has not paid the litigation expenses and is also not reportedly regular in payment of the maintenance, we deem it expedient to give one opportunity to the appellant to defend the proceedings and to file written statement.

¶6In view of the above, the order dated 07.05.2022 proceeding ex-parte against the appellant and the impugned order dated 11.05.2023 are set aside. Appellant is granted five weeks' time to file written statement from today with advance copy to learned counsel for the respondent who shall file replication, if any, before the next date of hearing.

¶7The Family Court is also requested to expedite the proceedings

and endeavour to conclude the same expeditiously.

¶8Appeal is allowed in the above terms.

¶9Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 29, 2023 st

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 29th May, 2023 + RUBY KASANA ..... Appellant versus MANJEET SINGH ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Ms. Kritika M. Bura, Advocate with appellant in person. For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Dubey, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.