- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 29 May 2023
- Bench
- Tushar Rao Gedela
- Case no.
- CM(M) 921/2023
Judgment
JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]
¶1Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 29292/2023 (for exemption)
¶2The application stands disposed of.
¶3Petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to the learned Trial Court to take up the application seeking leave to defend, as also the application under Order VII Rules 11 and 12 on the next date CM(M) 921/2023
CM(M) 921/2023
of hearing and dispose it of.
¶4In view of the fact that the petitioner herein is a retired person and the eviction petition has been sought uner Order 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, as also the submissions of the learned counsel that the petitioner seeks to earn his livelihood from the said premises, it is deemed appropriate to request the learned Trial Cout to take up the leave to defend as also the application under Order VII Rules 11 and 12 CPC, 1908 on 13.07.2023 and endeavour to dispose of the same expeditiously.
¶5In view of the above direction, the present petition is dimposed of.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. MAY 29, 2023/nd
Case details
Parties and counsel
CM(M) 921/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 29.05.2023 + CM(M) 921/2023 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus RAJ KUMAR RATTAN KUMAR AND SONS ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : None. CORAM:
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.