Akhil Bhartiya Lodhi Adhivakta Sangh v. Union of India

O R D E R %

06.11.2024

¶1After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant submits that taking into account that the primary grievances sought to be now raised by the appellant were not even raised in the writ petition, he may be granted leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh petition assailing Section 52(b) of the Advocates Act and/or Order IV Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

¶2Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this request. This is a digitally signed order. 3. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed making it clear that it will be open for the appellant to file a fresh petition assailing the aforesaid provisions which petition when filed will be considered on its own merits. REKHA PALLI, J SAURABH BANERJEE, J NOVEMBER 6, 2024 kk This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 198/2020, CM APPL. 20260/2020 (impleadment) & CM APPL. 18196/2020 –Int. Relief AKHIL BHARTIYA LODHI ADHIVAKTA SANGH .....Appellant Through: Mr.Tirpuni Rai, Mr.Varun Thakur, Mr.Ramkaran, Ms.Shraddha Saran & Mr.Brajesh Pandey, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Devrat Yadav, Adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vipin Nair, Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr.Nikhil Jain, Mr.Kaustabh Shukla, Dr.Meenakshi Kalra, Ms.Pragya Parijat Singh & Ms.Meghana Gade, Advs. for R-4. Mr.Umesh Babu Chaurasia, Adv. for Intervenor. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE