Praful Surana v. Income Tax Officer Ward 30 1 & Ors

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM No.39140/2023

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 39139/2023

¶2This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023.

¶3A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner's counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been passed.

¶4Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as

W.P.(C) 7624/2023

per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.

¶5It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the time order dated

30.05.2023 was passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred.

¶6In our view, this application is completely without merit.

¶7The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶8Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE

GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE AUGUST 2, 2023/RY

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

W.P.(C) 7624/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023 + W.P.(C) 7624/2023 PRAFUL SURANA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 30 1 & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Gaurav Gupta, Sr. Standing Counsel. Mr Chiranjiv Kumar & Mukesh Sachdeva, Advs. for U.O.I. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]