VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Parmanand Vijay Kumar v. Yogesh Kapoor & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 September 2026
Bench
Harish Vaidyanathanauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 170/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1The present Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks the following reliefs: ―1. Call for the records of RC ARC No. 694/2023 titled "Yogesh Kapoor & Ors. v. M/s Pannanand Vijay Kumar from the Court of Ld. ARC-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi;

¶2Set aside the impugned Judgment and Order dated 19/11/2025 passed in RC ARC No. 694/2023 titled "Yogesh Kapoor & Ors. v. M/s Parmanand Vijay Kumar" by the Court of Ld. ARC-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi by Ld. ARC 02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi dismissing the Petitioner's application for leave to defend and passing an eviction order under Section 14(1) Proviso (e) read with Section 25-B DRC Act, 1958;

¶3Allow the Petitioner's leave to defend application and restore the Eviction Petition RC ARC No. 694/2023 titled "Yogesh Kapoor & Ors. v. M/s Parmanand Vijay Kumar" to the file of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. the Ld. ARC-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, for trial in accordance with law, permitting the Petitioner to file Written Statement and lead its defence; or in the alternative

¶4Dismiss the Eviction Petition RC ARC No. 694/2023 RC ARC No. 694/2023 titled ―Yogesh Kapoor & Ors. v. M/s Parmanand Vijay Kumar‖;

¶5Award costs of this Petition to the Petitioner; and

¶6Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.‖

¶2Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that the parties have arrived at a settlement, in terms whereof the Petitioner has agreed to vacate the tenanted premises, being two shops converted into one shop and one Godown/store on the back side of the ground floor of Property bearing No. 488, Bartan Market, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 ["Subject premises"], on or before 02.10.2026.

¶3Learned Senior Counsel for the parties further submit that, until the date of vacating the Subject premises, the Petitioner shall continue in occupation thereof upon payment of rent at the rate presently being paid by the Petitioner.

¶4Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, on instructions, undertakes that the Petitioner shall file an Affidavit of Undertaking in the aforesaid terms within a period of two (02) weeks from today. It is further submitted that, in the event of failure to file the said Affidavit within the stipulated period, the Petitioner shall be liable to vacate the Subject premises forthwith.

¶5Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner further undertakes, on instructions, that any breach of the terms contained in the aforesaid undertaking shall render the Petitioner liable to such consequences as may be permissible in law, inter alia, initiation of appropriate contempt proceedings. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶6It is directed that the Affidavit of Undertaking, upon being filed by the Petitioner, be taken on record by the Registry.

¶7In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, the present Petition, along with the pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/tk/DJ

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010216982026 + RC.REV. 170/2026, CM APPL. 32583/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 41691/2026 (Dir.) & CM APPL. 51353/2026 (Seeking vacation of the interim protection by Respondent) M/S PARMANAND VIJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Vishnu, Advocate. versus YOGESH KAPOOR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate along with Mr. P.K. Rawal, Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Mr. Akhil Singh and Mr. Aryan Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.