- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
- Case no.
- CS(COMM) 1379/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1This order is in continuation of the earlier orders dated 4th October, 2016 and 6th October, 2016.
¶2The counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff agrees with the legal position as mentioned in paras 7&8 of the order dated 4th October, 2016 and the valuation of this suit is below the minimum pecuniary jurisdiction of this court and this suit is entertainable by the court of the District Judge. He seeks transfer of the suit to the subordinate courts.
¶3As noted in the order dated 4th October, 2016, the plaintiff had earlier instituted this suit in the subordinate courts and had on 26th November, 2014 sought return of the plaint for filing the same in this court.
¶4In these circumstances, I am of the view that no case for transfer is made out.
¶5The plaint be returned to the plaintiff for filing in the court of appropriate jurisdiction.
¶6The suit is disposed of in terms of above.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
OCTOBER 26, 2016 'pp'..
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) No.1379/2016, IA.No.12376/2016(u/O 39 R 1&2 CPC) & IA.No.12378/2016 (for condonation of 145 days delay in re-filing) MAN MOHAN BABBAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.L. Rajora, Adv. versus KIMTI LAL BABBAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.