- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 September 2026
- Bench
- Mini Pushkarna
- Case no.
- CONT.CAS(C) 770/2023
Judgment
O R D E R %
01.09.2026
¶1The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 30th September, 2016, passed by the Maintenance Tribunal (Central District) Delhi, in the case bearing no. 104/Harcharan Singh/Central/2015/1482-84.
¶2The relevant paragraph of the said order, reads as under: "xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. xxx xxx xxx"
¶3Perusal of the aforesaid order clearly shows that the petitioners herein were directed to provide to the respondent herein a duplicate set of keys of the lock/door installed in the staircase on the second floor of the property in question, so that the respondent could go upstairs to use the common open terrace of the property in question to check overhead water tank.
¶4This Court is informed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners herein that the door which had earlier been installed in the staircase of second floor has since been removed.
¶5However, on a pointed query by this Court, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners admits that there exists a door for access to the terrace of the property in question. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
¶6Attention of this Court has also been drawn to the order dated 11th January, 2023, passed in CONT.CAS(C) 884/2022, titled as Harcharan Singh Versus Mrs Ranjeet Kaur & Ors., filed on behalf of the respondent.
¶7The relevant portions of the said order, read as under: "xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx"
¶8Perusal of the aforesaid order shows that it is the categorical stand of the petitioners herein that they have not raised any hindrance to the access of the respondent to the terrace.
¶9This Court further notes that the aforesaid order records the statement on behalf of the petitioners herein that they have not interfered with the access of the respondent herein to the terrace of the property in question.
¶10The petitioners herein have been held bound by the aforesaid statement with regard to not interfering with the access of the respondent herein to the terrace.
¶11Accordingly, it is clear the petitioners are to provide clear access of the terrace existing in the property in question to the respondent herein. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
¶12Accordingly, the petitioners, in terms of the previous orders passed by this Court and the order dated 30th September, 2016, passed by the Tribunal, are directed to ensure that unhindered access is given to the respondent herein to the terrace of the property in question.
¶13In case, the door to the terrace is locked, the petitioner herein shall give a key to the respondent to the said lock, so that the respondent is able to access the terrace for the purposes of checking the water tanks installed therein.
¶14It is clarified that this order shall not be construed by the respondent as an unhindered and free access to the terrace of the property in question.
¶15The respondent shall access the terrace only in a limited manner to check the water tanks, in case need be and not for any other purpose.
¶16It is further clarified that the respondent shall only access the water tanks, which as per the petitioners, are installed on the mumty of the terrace.
¶17This order shall also not be construed by the respondent in any manner to obstruct the petitioners' possession of the terrace/third floor of the property in question, in any manner whatsoever.
¶18With the aforesaid directions, the present petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/ak The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010222762023 + CONT.CAS(C) 770/2023 & CM APPL. 66053/2023 SURINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Mr. Fahad Khan, Ms. Shubdha Jain and Mr. Nawab Sahab, Advocates Mob: 8802152841 versus HARCHARAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Mr. Amaan Khan and Mr. Pushkit, Advocates Mob: 9910870397 Email: siddhantadv.nath@gmail.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.