- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 May 2023
- Bench
- Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 7943/2023
Judgment
J U D G M E N T (oral)
¶1Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking following relief(s): "A. Issue a writ of Certiorari Mandamus or any other Writ or Direction or Order, to call for the records in Repatriation Order no.Estt/Depu/192/54 Bn/2023/6917-26 dated
19.05.2023 and Movement Order no. Estt/1272(150)/54/2023/6941-49 dated
19.05.2023 and quash the same, and in furtherance direct Respondent No.2 to place the case of the Petitioner for absorption before the Screening Committee / Board of Officers as per the Standard Operating Procedure dated 31.01.2013; and B. Issue Orders to the Respondent No. 2 to permit the Petitioner to discharge the functions as Sub Inspector/Junior Engineer (Electrical) during the pendency of this Writ Petition."
¶2After hearing learned counsel for petitioner and in view of averments
made in the present petition, we hereby direct respondents to decide the case of petitioner in view of policy dated 31.01.2013 (Annexure P-5) within two weeks. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within three days thereafter with a reasoned order.
¶3With the aforesaid directions, present petition is disposed of.
¶4Pending application stands disposed of.
¶5Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his case, he may approach the appropriate forum.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE
(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE MAY 31, 2023/rk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 31st May, 2023 + W.P.(C) 7943/2023 & CM APPL. 30604/2023 NARENDRA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj V. George, Mr. Vignesh Ram and Mr. Nasib Masih, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law), BSF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.