Delhi Home Guard Welfare Association & Anr v. Govt.Of NCT Delhi & Ors

ORDER %

20.05.2013 An issue in the present cases is the claim of the petitioners who were Home Guards for being continued their services as Home Guards as also for absorption. An identical issue has been decided by the Division Bench of this Court in WP(C) No. 3126/2001 titled as Anant Prasad & Ors. Vs. UOI

¶1& Ors. decided on 24.1.2013.

¶2In view of the decision of the Division Bench in W.P.(C) No. 3126/2001, these writ petitions are also dismissed. Since the judgment of the Division Bench dated 24.1.2013 is stated to have been challenged before the Supreme Court, in case the SLP is decided in favour of the persons such as the petitioners, then the petitioners will have a right to revive these writ petitions.

¶3VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J MAY 20, 2013 W W.P.(C) 17408/2004 & conn. N A IS { JjT A-aIcjmc . 0%lr(

i.lltol3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 17408/2004 KAMLA PRASAD & ANR. + Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Nehra, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for Mr. V.K.Tandon, Adv. for R-1. W.P.(C) 921/2010 DELHI HOME GUARD WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. + ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Nehra, Adv. versus GOVT.OF NCT DELHI & ORS. Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for Mr. V.K.Tandon, Adv. for R-1. W.P.(C) 3007/2010 SURENDER KUMAR + Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for Mr. V.K.Tandon, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. for R-2. W.R(C) 17408/2004 & conn. Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA