- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 28 June 2023
- Bench
- C .Hari Shankar, Manoj Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 8620/2023
Judgment
O R D E R (O R A L) %
28.06.2023
per C.HARI SHANKAR, J
¶1This petition was preferred before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, despite the fact that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the impugned order dated 22 June 2023 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Tribunal-1 before the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (the DRAT). The petitioner nonetheless moved the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as, according to Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned DRAT is not sitting.
¶2Learned Counsel for the respondents submits, on the other hand, on instructions, that the DRAT is not only sitting but is also Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
disposing of matters.
¶3In view thereof, Mr Kirti Uppal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that the petitioner would withdraw the petition and move the learned DRAT to obtain appropriate relief.
¶4Reserving liberty with the petitioner to do so, the petition stands disposed of.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J (VACATION JUDGE)
MANOJ JAIN, J (VACATION JUDGE)
JUNE 28, 2023
ar Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8620/2023, CM APPL. 32715/2023 & CM APPL. 32716/2023 SZF EXPORTS PVT LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shukla, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ..... Respondent Through: (Appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.