VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2023 › High Court of Delhi

Jagmohan Singh (Senior Citizen) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
28 June 2023
Bench
C .Hari Shankarauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 8632/2023

Judgment

O R D E R (ORAL) %

28.06.2023

¶1Vide order dated 19 June 2023, passed under Section 343 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957, the petitioner was directed to demolish certain structures constructed on the property situated at DDA Flat No. A-705 (Ground Floor), Sarita Vihar, New Delhi-110076, which were alleged to be unauthorised.

¶2The concluding paragraph of the said order states that, in case the petitioner fails to demolish the said structures within six days, action for demolition would be initiated by the erstwhile South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC).

¶3Mr. Hasibuddin's only prayer is that, as the order dated 19 June 2023 is appealable before the learned Appellate Tribunal for the MCD ("the learned AT MCD"), till an appeal is filed and the learned AT MCD takes a decision on the stay application which the petitioner would be preferring along with the appeal, action for demolition be not taken on the basis of the order dated 19 June 2023, as, otherwise, the appeal/stay application would be rendered infructuous.

¶4Mr. Ajay Digpaul, learned Standing Counsel for MCD, submits that, if the appeal is preferred within a period of ten days from today, he would instruct the concerned officials in the MCD not to take coercive action to demolish the alleged unauthorised structure on the aforesaid property till the learned ATMCD takes a decision on the stay application which the petitioner would file with the appeal.

¶5Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to assail the the impugned order dated 19 June 2023 before the learned ATMCD within ten days from today.

¶6In case the petitioner applies for stay of operation of the order dated 19 June 2023, then, no coercive action would be taken by the MCD on the basis of the said order till the learned ATMCD takes a decision on the stay application filed by the petitioner.

¶7The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶8Miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J. (VACATION JUDGE)

JUNE 28, 2023

dsn

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8632/2023 & CM APPL. 32751/2023 JAGMOHAN SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Hasibuddin and Mr. Sourav Ghosh, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.