Satish v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr

J U D G M E N T

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (OPEN COURT)

CM APPL. 34009/2023 (Exemption) & CM APPL. 34010/2023 (Exemption)

Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions.

The applications stand disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(C) 8961/2023

¶1The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to :- a) Direct the respondent for the transferring of vending site of deceased Late Kirpal Singh on the name of petitioner as the petitioner was first legal heir of deceased as the petitioner's Father was found in the list of 628 at serial no. 352. b) Direct the respondent no.l for survey the petitioner as the petitioner's father was the existing vendor of NDMC area. c) Direct the Town Vending Committee (Respondent No.1) to consider the representation dated 26/06/2023 in accordance with law. d) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction or Pass such other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

¶2Issue notice.

¶3Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1/New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and Mr. Laksh Khanna, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 2/Delhi Police.

¶4The petitioner limits the relief in the present petition, seeking liberty to approach the concerned Town Vending Committee (TVC) of the area along with the relevant documents for appropriate relief i.e. substitution of his name, instead of that of his deceased father, Mr.

Kirpal Singh, who had featured at Serial No. 352 in the list of 628 vendors, prepared by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) in the year 2012.

¶5Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the NDMC states that, they do not oppose the limited relief, as extracted hereinabove, for the reason that the NDMC itself has asked the petitioner herein, to do precisely that.

¶6In view of the foregoing, the limited relief prayed for, on behalf of the petitioner, as afore-extracted is granted, permitting him to take necessary steps in accordance with law.

¶7No further relief is prayed for.

¶8The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶9Copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

(JUDGE)

GAURANG KANTH (JUDGE) JULY 07, 2023/rs

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

#S-15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered On: 07.07.2023 W.P.(C) 8961/2023 SATISH ….Petitioner Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ….Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC along with Ms. Harshita Gupta and Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for R-2/Delhi Police. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH