VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Infosys Technologies Limited v. Infy Career Pvt Ltd & Others

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 October 2011
Bench
Reva Khetrapalauthor
Case no.
CS(OS) 278/2010

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Reva Khetrapal

Judgment

ORDER %

31.10.2011 lA No.l7152/2011(under Order XXHI Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC) and CS(OS) 278/2010 This is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recording of the terms of compromise arrived at between the parties. The application is signed by the principal legal counsel of the plaintiff and by the constituted attorney of the defendants and is supported by their affidavits. The terms of compromise are set out in paragraphs 2(a) to 2(1) of the application, which is marked Exhibit P-1. The counsel for the parties state on instructions from the parties that the parties undertake to abide by the aforesaid terms of the compromise arrived at between them in letter and in spirit and that the said undertaking is CS(OS) 278/2010 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. /3 also contained in paragraph - 4 of the application. It is jointly prayed that a decree be passed in terms of paragraphs 2(a) to 2(1) of the application. A Demand Draft bearing No.19933 dated 29"' September, 2011 in the sum of X 1,80,000/- has been handed over by the defendants to the counsel for the plaintiff in Court, which has been accepted by the counsel for the plaintiff in terms of paragraph 2(j) of the application. In view of the aforesaid, the suit is decreed in terms of paragraphs 2(a) to 2(1). The Registry shall draw-up a decree-sheet accordingly. CS(OS) No.278/2010 and the present application stand disposed of. Parties are left to bear their own costs. The date fixed for C November, 2011 in the suit stands cancelled. lA No. 17153/2011 (for refund of court fees) This is an application under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 151 CPC, 1908 and Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 for refund of the court fees to the plaintiff and issuance of the necessary refund certificate. In view of the fact that the dispute between the parties in the present suit has been settled by way of mediation, the prayer is allowed. The application stands disposed of. REVA KHETRAPAL, J. OCTOBER 31, 2011 ak CS(OS) 278/2010

Case details

Parties and counsel

1-42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ,iu + CS(OS) 278/2010 INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepak Gogie, Mr. Bharadwaj Jaishankar and Mr. Prashant Gupta, Advocates. versus INLY CAREER PVT LTD & OTHERS Defendants Through: Ms. Vaishali Mittal with Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.