VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rohtash Kumar Gupta & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2024
Bench
Neena Bansal Krishnaauthor
Case no.
MAC.APP. 643/2019

Judgment

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶1An Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 has been filed on behalf of the Insurance Company to challenge the Award dated

12.04.2019, whereby the compensation in the sum of Rs.12,22,500/-, along with interest @ 9% per annum, has been granted to the Respondent No.1/ son of deceased Sh. Rameshwar Dayal Gupta, who was 76 years old at the time of his demise in the accident on 31.10.2017.

¶2The sole ground of challenge is that the deceased had only one claimant who is the married major son of the deceased. There is not an iota of evidence to show that he was financially dependent upon the deceased father. Moreover, the deceased was 76 years old and was getting a pension of Rs.29,813/- per month which cannot be considered as a case of Loss of

Dependency or income to Respondent No.1; rather it can only be taken as a Loss of Estate for which 2/3rd deduction from the pension should have been made to calculate the quantum of compensation.

¶3Submissions heard and record perused.

¶4Indisputably, the deceased was 76 years old and father of Respondent No.1 the son who was major and there is nothing to reflect that he was financially dependent on the deceased. Yet at the same time, it cannot be over looked that the deceased was residing with this major son. The learned Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd from the monthly pension of Rs.29,813/- towards his own personal expenses. However, it cannot be overlooked as he was 76 years old man and it can be reasonably taken that he would have been spending a lot more amount on his own personal requirements and thus, the deduction towards the personal expenses should have been made to the extent of ½.

¶5The compensation towards Loss of Dependency is, therefore, recalculated as Rs.29183 – 14591 (50%) X 5 X 12 = Rs.8,75,490/-.

¶6The compensation has, therefore revised as under: Sl. No. Compensation awarded under Head Amount awarded by the Tribunal Amount awarded by this Court

¶1Loss of Dependency 11,92,500/-8,75,490/-

¶2Loss of Estate 15,000/- Same

¶3Funeral Charges 15,000/-Same TOTAL COMPENSATION Rs.12,22,500/-Rs.9,05,490/-

The compensation granted vide impugned Award is hereby modified and

the total compensation granted is Rs.9,05,490/- along with interest @ 9% per annum as per the terms of the impugned Award dated 12.04.2019.

¶7The statutory amount deposited by the Insurance Company be refunded in accordance with law.

¶8The Appeal stands disposed of along with the pending application.

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE NOVEMBER 14, 2024 va

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:14th November, 2024 + MAC.APP. 643/2019, CM APPL. 29232/2019 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate. versus ROHTASH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.