Meena Chandra v. Savitri Devi Sharma

ORDER %

29.10.2010 It is stated that parties have entered into a compromise before the execution court wherein they have made the statement. Counsel for petitioner submits that there is a slight change and instead of vacating the premises on 30.10.2010, the petitioner will vacate the same on 07.11.2010 and respondent has no objection in this regard. It is stated that as agreed between them, petitioner shall pay all the electricity and water charges and arrears of rent to the respondent and they have also agreed that on doing the needful by petitioner, all pending litigations including counter claim filed against the respondent will be settled and will not be pressed by them. CM(M) 701/2010 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. In view of the settlement between the parties, counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the present petition and she be permitted to withdrawthe same. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. CM Nos. 9783/2010 & 9784/2010 In view of above order, no further orders are required to be passed on the present applications. The same stand disposed of accordingly. VEENABIRBALJ OCTOBER 29, 2010 kks CM(M) 701/2010

1. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 701/2010 MEENA CHANDRA Petitioner Through : Mr. B.K. Saini (with petitioner in person), proxy for Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. versus SAVITRI DEVI SHARMA Respondent Through : Mr. Atui Nigam, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL