UOI v. Wishwa Mitter Bajaj & Sons & A

JUDGMENT MUKUL MUDGAL, J ; (ORAL)

¶1After some arguments,the learned senior counsel for the respondent states that he is not opposingthe considerationof Appellant'sobjectionsto the Award by the learnedSingleJudge but requeststhat the matterbe taken up at an early date and some cost be paid to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee,New Delhi ('DHCLSC'). Accordingly,the delay is FAO(OS)No. 132/2007 PageNo. 1 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. condoned arid the impugned order dated 6^^ March, 2007 is set aside and taking into account the fact that a sum of Rs. 85 lacs is involved, we are of the view that Rs. 8,500/- as cost shall be deposited in the DHCLSC by the Appellant/UOInot later than 4^*^ November,2008. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, DHCLSC for seeking enforcement, if the need so arise. The parties are directedto appear before the learned Single Judge on 16^^ October, 2008. The learned Single Judge will consider an early disposal in view of the order passed today by this Court.

¶2The appeal stands allowed in these terms. MUKUL MUDGAL, J llcu,v^ MANMdHAN, J SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 sb FAO(OS) No. 132/2007 $-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 132/2007 UOI Appellant Represented by: None versus WISHWA MITTER BAJAJ & SONS & A Respondents Representedby: Mr.SamarSinghKachwaha, Advocate with Mr.Raghavendra M.Bajaj and Ms.Mithu Jain, Advocates for the applicant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER %

04.03.2014 CM No.4119/2014 Allowed. CM No.4118/2014 Application stands disposed of directing that if appellant has depositedany moneypursuantto the orderdatedJuly 23, 2007 passedin the appealthe same shallbe treatedas a depositinOMP No.448/20I

PRADEEP NANDmJOG, J.

JAYANT NATH, J. MARCH 04, 2014 mamta

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS)NO. 132/2007 % DateofDecision: September22"*^,2008 UOI Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Chaddha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Preeti Dalai and Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Advocates. versus WISHWA MITTAR BAJAJ & SONS & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? X 2. To be referredto theReporteror not? V 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? V- >