Pinki Tour and Travels Limited v. Income Tax Department

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM No.38630/2023

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10021/2023 & CM No.38631/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief]

¶2Issue notice.

2.1 Mr Ruchir Bhatia, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/revenue.

¶3Given the direction that we propose to issue, Mr Bhatia says that he does not wish to file a counter-affidavit and he will argue the matter based on the record presently available with the court.

3.1 Therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself.

¶4This writ petition concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.

¶5The principal ground on which the petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 31.03.2023, passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "Act"], is that the reply dated 27.03.2023, submitted in response to the notice dated 22.03.2023, issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act, has not been taken into consideration.

¶6This position seems to emerge on a perusal of the impugned order dated 31.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act.

¶7Having regard to this position, the impugned order dated 31.03.2023, passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act, and the consequential notice of even date, i.e., 31.03.2023 issued under Section 148 of the Act, are set aside.

¶71. Liberty is, however, given to the AO to pass a fresh order.

7.2 The AO will issue a notice to the petitioner, according it an opportunity of hearing in the matter, albeit, through its authorised representative. The notice will indicate the date and time of the hearing.

7.3 The AO will take into account the reply dated 27.03.2023 submitted by the petitioner.

7.4 Needless to add, the AO will pass a speaking order, a copy of which will be furnished to the petitioner.

¶8The writ petition is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

¶9Consequently, the pending interlocutory application shall stand closed.

¶10Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the judgment.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 31, 2023 aj

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 31.07.2023 + W.P.(C) 10021/2023 & CM Nos.38630-31/2023 PINKI TOUR AND TRAVELS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Chander Kant Tyagi and Mr Amar Gupta, Advs. versus INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]