Satish Kumar Lamba v. Colonel Retd. Sudershan Kumar

Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ' I

¶16.. - •.1 , I { We, thus, do not find any infirmity with the passing of the preliminary decree and, thus, find that RFA (OS) No. 6/2007 is devoid of any merit and dismiss the same. As already point out ~. ..... 1 / I above, no arguments were raised insofar as validity of order dated

12.12,.2006 is concerned. Therefore. FAO (OS) No. 45/2007 is also dismissed in view of the fact that the appellant failed to lead evidence despite repeated opportunities given. All the pending applications also stand dismissed. Cb~ts shall follow the event. ( ,K.

1.1-->---­ SIKRI) JUDGE '\~ -(""'b \,. CJ. 'o(""S,'1 (MANMOHAN SINGH) JUDGE August .lo • 2008 nsk Page 13 or 13 fAO roD 45/07 9i BFA (Oi! 6/2{)¢Z nR<