VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

S.K.Gupta @ Surender Kumar & A v. K.B.K.Sahni

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 September 2008
Bench
Veena Birbalauthor
Case no.
RSA 96/2007

Judgment

% 26.09.2008 Present: Mr. Lalit Gupta for the appellants Mr. R.S. Mahla for the respondent with respondent in person +CM No. 14119/08 & RSA 96/2007 This application has been moved by the parties jointly under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. It is claimed that the parties have entered into a compromise and pray that the appeal be disposed of in terms of this compromise. The decree holder Mr. K.B.K. Sahni in whose favour the impugned judgment of the Appellate Court has been awarded is also present in Court. Let his statement be recorded. Statement of Mr. K.B.K. Sahni, the respondent in this matter, has been recorded on oath. The statement of counsel for the appellants, Mr. Lalit Gupta has also been recorded without oath. The parties have settled all their disputes inter-se, and a joint application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC has also been filed. The parties shall be bound by their statements and the terms of their application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The amount deposited by the appellants in this Court in terms of this Court's orders passed on 30.3.2007 along with interest, if any, accrued thereon be released to the respondent on proper identification as per rules. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. The appeal and the apphcation are disposed of in the above terms. Acopyof CM No.14119/2008shall be annexed to this order. Dasti to both the parties. Sudershan Kum^Misra^ J. September 26, 2008 rs

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.