- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 November 2010
- Bench
- Veena Birbal
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 50/2010
Judgment
ORDER o/o
23.LL.2OLO After Some arguments, counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that petitioner be giveri time till 23.II.2012 to vacate the premises in question. Ld. counsel has also stated that he will be filing his vakalatnama in the Registry today itself. The' respondent is present in person. Under the instructionsi, from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 23.!L.201-2 ln view of above statement given by the counsel for parties, the present petition and pending application stand disposed of as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time till iL RC.REV. sti/2010 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. )4, {1>
23.IJ,.2012 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking by the petitioner within two weeks with a copy to the resPondent. List this matter on 2I.12.2010 for filing of undertaking. Respondent will not execute the eviction order till next date. t'lr^'V VE{ABIRBAI-J NOVEMBER 23,2OLO ld<s ,,L '$r j.4,., il,r,Ji|"J-bfrffi^'el r' I r " Wpa) 4n*{.po,D-t}ref61 zr Irt Ir o --U4 ltrl''-6'*'{ 6g6.t-^n1e fr14 b /e/<,*- RC.REV. sti/2010
Case details
Parties and counsel
B r> 23. X IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.50/2010 & CM No.4302l20]-O SUNIL MONGA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Ahlawat, Adv. along with petitioner in Person HARI SINGH VCTSUS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. L.K. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.