- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 August 2026
- Bench
- Om Prakash Shukla
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 1211/2026
Judgment
JUDGMENT(ORAL) %
31.08.2026
¶1Parties are ad idem that the dispute can be referred to the arbitration.
¶2In the present cases, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.
¶3Further, the parties are ad idem with respect to the reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.
¶4Accordingly, Mr. Raji Gururaj, Advocate, (Mob. No. 9704847263) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.
¶5The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI
ARB.P. 1211/2026
proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.
¶6The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre ("DIAC"). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
¶7It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
¶8It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes with claims and counter claims independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
¶9The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Raji Gururaj, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
¶10Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms. OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/at
Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI
Case details
Parties and counsel
ARB.P. 1211/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010322352026 + ARB.P. 1211/2026 M/S INNOVISION LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shagun Shahi Chugh and Mr. Yudhveer Singh, Advs. versus M/S GATEWAY DISTRIPARKS LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Advocate (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.