- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 29 May 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan Singh
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 114/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan Singh
Judgment
ORDER
29.05.2013 The abovementioned petitions have been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. Today when the matters are listed for consideration, learned counsel for the parties agree for appointment of a sole Arbitrator. So, Mr.Prashant Mehta, Advocate (Mobile No.9999590003), is appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. Both the parties are allowed + + % Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. to file their claims and counter-claims. The Arbitrator shall conduct the proceedings under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall give prior notice before commencing the proceedings. Total fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be payable to the tune of Z2 lac (Rupees Two Lac) which shall be borne by both the parties in equal proportion. The petitions are accordingly disposed of Copies of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties. A copy of the order be also communicated to the learned sole Arbitrator. CAY ( r1ANMOflAN SINGH, J. MAY 29, 2013/jk 4*
Case details
Parties and counsel
I A, $15&16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 113/2013 M/S CARNATION AUTO INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through Mr.Rishi Kapoor, Ms.Gitanj au Kapoor and Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Advs. versus KISHORBHAI THAKORBHAI PATEL .....Respondent Through Mr.Kalp Raichura, Mr.Rajat Vats and Mr.Harish Raichura, Advs. ARB.P. 114/2013 M/S CARNATION AUTO INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through Mr.Rishi Kapoor, Ms.Gitanjali Kapoor and Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Advs. versus M/S KAMDHENU SERVICES Respondent Through Mr.Kalp Raichura, Mr.Rajat Vats and Mr.Harish Raichura, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.