Usha Rani Rohilla v. Jai Kumar

O R D E R %

05.11.2024

¶1At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner has stated that in view of the amicable settlement between the parties, suits in question have been withdrawn by the plaintiffs.

¶2Petitioner herein is defending such two suits filed by different plaintiffs and was aggrieved by the order in relation to appointment of Local Commissioner.

¶3Fact, however, remains that vide order dated 19.10.2024 passed by learned Trial Court, in view of the above-said amicable settlement between This is a digitally signed order. CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 2

the parties, learned Trial Court has already permitted the plaintiffs to withdraw their respective suits. Statements of the plaintiffs have also been recorded separately to the aforesaid effect.

¶4In view of the aforesaid peculiar development, the present petitions do not survive anymore and, therefore, these are accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous in view of the aforesaid settlement.

MANOJ JAIN, J NOVEMBER 5, 2024/dr This is a digitally signed order.

CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM APPL. 34612/2024 USHA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Achal Gupta, Ms. Deepa and Ms. Alizaah Rais, Advocates versus BHUPINDER SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: None + CM(M) 2789/2024 & CM APPL. 34780/2024 USHA RANI ROHILLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Achal Gupta, Ms. Deepa and Ms. Alizaah Rais, Advocates versus JAI KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN