Rakesh Kumar Chilana v. Rakesh Mehta & Anr

ORDER %

11.03.2010 C.M. AdpI. No.4417/2010 This applicationis made on behalf of respondentsfor correctingthe name of counselfor the respondentsinthe orderdated6"^ January,2010. The applicationis allowedand name of Ms. Anusuya Salw^anbe scored off and nameof Ms. MadhuTewatia,Advocatefor respondentsbe inserted.. The application is disposed of CONT.CAS(C) 215/2008 Nothing survives in the contempt petition as the petitioner has already been allowed to continue as a lecturer from the date of his reversion. His pay arrears have also been paid. His grievance is about seniority and grade pay. That cannot be the subject Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. matter of contempt petition before this Court. The contemptpetition is disposedof MARCH 11,2010 aj SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J % J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 215/2009 RAKESHKUMARCHILANA Petitioner Through:Mr. F. Paul,Advocate. versus RAKESHMEHTA& ANR. Respondent Through:Mr.V.K.Tandon,Advocatefor DSSSB Ms. Sidhi Arora for NDMC CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER %

13.08.2010 This Contempt Petition was disposed of by this Court on ll"" March, 2010. Whileconsignmentofthefile to the recordroom, it has cometo lightthatatypographical errorhad creptin the orderdated 11"" March,2009. The year ofthe case was mentioned as'2008'instead of'2009'. The order dated 11March, 2010 stands corrected. The correct case number is CONT.CAS(C) 215/2009. SHiV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J AUGUST 13, 2010 %

X" * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 215/2008 RAKESH KUMAR CfflLANA Petitioner Through: Mr. F. Paul, Advocate. versus RAKESH MEHTA & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr.V.K. Tandon, Advocate for DSSSB Ms. Sidhi Arora for NDMC CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA