Mahikaa Pathak & Ors v. Union of India & Ors

O R D E R %

07.11.2024

¶1Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submits that by this time, the main prayer of the petitioners has been rendered infructuous.

¶2He, however, confines his prayer to the extent of directing respondent No.3 to consider returning the registration fees.

¶3In view of the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners to file a proper representation before the said authority, and in case, such a representation is made, let the same be decided in accordance with law and due expedition.

This is a digitally signed order. 4. In light of the aforesaid, the instant petition, alongwith pending application, stands disposed of.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/p This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8639/2024 and CM APPL. 35375/2024 MAHIKAA PATHAK & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tarun Diwan and Ms. Pyari, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Ms. Sanjana Mehrotra and Mr. Arindam Sarin, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha and Mr. Sachin Bhatt, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Karandeep Singh, Tarandeep Singh, Advs. for NTA/R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV