VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Mnt Rubber Llp v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 August 2026
Bench
Swarana Kanta Sharmaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 11898/2026

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Swarana Kanta Sharma

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.08.2026 CM APPL. 55036/2026 (exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11898/2026 & CM APPL. 55035/2026, CM APPL. 55037/2026, CM APPL. 55038/2026

¶3By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs: ―a. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to release forthwith — the court-fee refund of Rs.83,889/- (Rs. Eighty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Nine Only). in favour of the Petitioner in terms of the order dated 16.02.2026 passed by the Learned District Judge (Commercial Court-05), South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS (COMM.) No. , 122/2026. b. Direct the Respondents to pay interest at 24% per annum, or The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. such rate as this Hon'ble Court deems fit, from the date the refund became payable until actual payment. c. Direct Respondent Nos.4 to produce before this Hon'ble Court the complete refund file, including the noting sheets, movement register, diary register and all connected records. d. Direct the Respondent No.4 to disclose the names and designations of every officer and official who dealt with the Petitioner's refund application. e. Direct the competent Vigilance [Anti-Corruption Authority to conduct an | independent inquiry into the Petitioner's allegations regarding the alleged demand for iNegal gratification by the unidentified dealing clerk and to take action in accordance with law if the allegations are substantiated. f. Direct initiation of appropriate departmental proceedings against any officer or official found responsible for the unexplained delay, suppression of the file, failure to communicate deficiencies, or any other misconduct ‗revealed during the proceedings. g. Award compensation to the Petitioner for the financial loss and ‗harassment suffered due to the Respondents' arbitrary conduct, h. Award exemplary costs of Rs.1,00,000/- in favour of the Petitioner...‖

¶4Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of respondent/GNCTD accepts notice.

¶5Briefly stated the facts of the present case, as mentioned in the writ petition, are that the Commercial Court, Saket, vide order dated 16.02.2026, had directed to refund the court fees amounting to ₹83,889/- to the petitioner. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner had submitted an application for refund on 11.05.2026. However, despite repeated visits to the concerned office, reminders, an RTI application and a legal notice, the amount has not been refunded to the petitioner till date. It is further alleged that on 13.07.2026, a clerk had demanded a sum of ₹5,000/- for expediting the refund and the petitioner had refused to make such payment. Despite the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. specific direction of the Commercial Court and the petitioner's repeated follow-ups, the refund of ₹83,889/- remains unpaid, compelling the petitioner to approach this Court.

¶6After hearing learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and in view of the issue involved in the instant petition, this Court finds it appropriate to direct that the present petition filed before this Court be treated as a representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondents are directed to decide the same, within a period of four weeks from date, under intimation to the petitioner herein.

¶7In above terms, the present petition alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of.

¶8In case of any further grievance, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court by filing fresh writ petition.

¶9The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J AUGUST 18, 2026/ns vs

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010382512026 + W.P.(C) 11898/2026 & CM APPL. 55035/2026, CM APPL. 55038/2026, CM APPL. 55037/2026 MNT RUBBER LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Panel Counsel, GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.