VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

A S Polymers v. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward 71

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 August 2026
Bench
Anil Kshetarpalauthor, Shail Jain
Case no.
W.P.(C) 11909/2026

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anil KshetarpalFollow Shail Jain

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.08.2026

¶1The only prayer made in the present Writ Petition is for a direction to the Respondent to decide the pending application for cancellation of the Petitioner"s GST Registration No. 07ACIFA2496C3ZG.

¶2The Petitioner claims that the application for cancellation of registration was submitted on

27.05.2026, vide ARN AA070526109391D, and has remained pending. It is submitted that the application has been unnecessarily kept pending, particularly in view of the fact that, under Section 29(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, cancellation of registration does not affect the liability of the person to pay tax and other dues or to discharge any obligation under the Act or the Rules for any period prior to the date of cancellation. This is a digitally signed order. 3. Learned counsel representing the Respondent undertakes that the application of the Petitioner shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of two (02) weeks.

¶4In view of the aforesaid statement and undertaking, no further order is required to be passed.

¶5The present Writ Petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of accordingly.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 18, 2026 s.godara/pal

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010382622026 + W.P.(C) 11909/2026 and CM APPL. 55062/2026 A S POLYMERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Mr. Jatin Gaur and Mr. Adarsh Mishra, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER GSTO WARD 71 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Batra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.