Mukesh Kumar Choudhary & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

O R D E R %

18.08.2026

¶1During course of arguments, learned APP for State informed that the Court has already decided the charges and with respect to the present applicant, there is already a direction to charge him for offence under Section 308 IPC as well and the case is now fixed for 21.09.2026 for framing of formal charges.

¶2The present petition takes exception to the order whereby the Court had, merely, taken cognizance of the offences.

¶3After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioners, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate remedy and to assail the abovesaid order on charge by filing appropriate petition.

¶4The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of, as withdrawn.

¶5All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

¶6Needless to say, petitioners are always be at liberty to take appropriate remedy, in case, they are aggrieved by the order whereby the charges have been ascertained.

¶7It is, however, clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case. MANOJ JAIN, J

AUGUST 18, 2026/sw/sa This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010382852026 + CRL.M.C. 6034/2026& CRL.M.A. 25224/2026 & CRL.M.A. 25225/2026 & CRL.M.A. 25350/2026 MUKESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Gandhi, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Sunil. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN