Shri Pratap Singh v. Gnctd

ORDER(ORAL) % 19.08.2026

¶1The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator, Mr. Ankur Chhibber.

¶2The learned Sole Arbitrator was appointed by this Court vide order dated 04.10.2023.

¶3It is borne out from the record that the arbitral proceedings have already concluded and the matter is reserved for pronouncement of award vide order dated 23.07.2025.

¶4Issue notice.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 655/2026

¶5Notice is accepted on behalf of the Respondent by Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate.

¶6Parties are ad idem that the extension of the mandate can be granted.

¶7Having regard to the fact that the proceedings stand concluded and the matter has already been reserved for pronouncement of the award, this Court is of the view that sufficient cause is made out for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.

¶8Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended retrospectively with effect from 02.08.2025 till 30.11.2026, to enable the learned Arbitrator to pronounce the award.

¶9The learned Sole Arbitrator shall endeavour to render the arbitral award within the extended period.

¶10The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶11Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J AUGUST 19, 2026/gunn

Signed By:PREETI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010384572026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 655/2026 & I.A. 22520/2026 SHRI PRATAP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Poonam, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Mr. Raj Tiwari and Mr. George Lincoln, Advs. versus GNCTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA