- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 August 2026
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- RSA 149/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Neena Bansal Krishna
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.08.2026
¶1Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed on behalf of the Appellants against the judgment and decree dated
04.02.2026 whereby the learned Appellate Court has upheld the order of the learned Civil Judge dismissing the Suit of the Plaintiff.
¶2Learned Counsel for the Appellants states that the decree already stands executed and the possession has been taken by the Respondent. He seeks permissions to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to pursue his remedy under the Hindu Law or seek partition in accordance with law.
¶3In view of the submissions made, the Appeal along with pending Application, is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. This is a digitally signed order. 4. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 19, 2026 N This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010385412026 + RSA 149/2026, CM APPL. 55510/2026, CM APPL. 55511/2026, CM APPL. 55512/2026, CM APPL. 55513/2026 YOGESH GUPTA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Chander Agrawal and Mr. Kartik Kumar Agrawal, Advocates versus VIMLA DEVI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.