- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 August 2026
- Bench
- Manoj Jain
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 3424/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manoj Jain
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 25522/2026 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 3424/2026
¶1Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 0195/2024, registered at Police Station Khyala for commission of offences under Sections 392/394/34 IPC.
¶2One of the prime contentions coming from the side of applicant is to the effect that though, the applicant had been arrested on 05.04.2024, the trial has yet not commenced as even the charges have not been framed.
¶3Learned Addl. P.P. for State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.
¶4Concerned investigating officer is also present. This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 3424/2026 2
¶5It is submitted that next date before the learned Trial Court is
29.09.2026 for arguments on charge.
¶6After some arguments, learned counsel for applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application at this stage. He, however, states that learned Trial Court may be requested to ascertain the charges, as expeditiously as possible, particularly in view of the aforesaid long incarceration period and previous clean antecedents of the applicant. He also submits that in case charges are not ascertained expeditiously, he may be permitted to revive the present bail application.
¶7In view of the above, present bail application is disposed of, as not pressed.
¶8All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
¶9Learned Trial Court is requested to hear the arguments on charge on the aforesaid next date and to proceed further with the matter, in accordance with law. In case charges are not ascertained within a period of six weeks, the applicant would be at liberty to revive the present application.
¶10A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court for information and due compliance.
MANOJ JAIN, J AUGUST 19, 2026/dr/js This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
BAIL APPLN. 3424/2026 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010386152026 + BAIL APPLN. 3424/2026 ROHTASH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr.Dharmender Kr. and Ms. Deepti Sagar, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.