- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 August 2026
- Bench
- Swarana Kanta Sharma
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 11990/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Swarana Kanta Sharma
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.08.2026 CM APPL. 55668/2026 (exemption)
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11990/2026 & CM APPL. 55667/2026
¶3By way of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs: "a) Issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. or direction, quashing and setting aside the Order dated
27.06.2026 bearing No. 30309/GeM/Gen/77/E3ES issued by Respondent No. 3 (Annexure P-1), insofar as it debars the Petitioner for a period of six months from participation in any bid in the Area of Responsibility of Project Udayak; b) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 to forthwith withdraw, recall and expunge the said debarment from all records, registers and databases maintained by or on behalf of the Ministry of Defence and the Border Roads Organisation; c) Award to the Petitioner the costs of and incidental to the present petition..."
¶4Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 4 accepts notice.
¶5The petitioner states that it had made detailed representations to respondent on. 3 seeking withdrawal of the debarment order, primarily on the ground that the process which was to be followed for passing such order has not been followed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that no show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioner, before the order was passed.
¶6After hearing arguments addressed on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondent no. 1, this Court finds it appropriate to direct that the present petition filed before this Court be treated as a representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondents are directed to decide the same, within a period of one week from date, under intimation to the petitioner herein.
¶7In above terms, the present petition stands disposed of.
¶8In case of any further grievance, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court by filing a fresh writ petition.
¶9Copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of Court Master. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
¶10The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J AUGUST 19, 2026/ns vs The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010386472026 + W.P.(C) 11990/2026 GABION TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Chugh, Mr. Jai Allagh, Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Mr. Sarthak Mittal, Mr. Pushp Sharma and Mr. Saksham Tyagi, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Mr. Sahil Sharma and Ms. Tanya, Advocates for Respondents with Mr Vinay Kaushik, Government Pleader Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr. Akshay Shankar and Ms. Ananya Dewan, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.