VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Sh Kali Charan v. Sh.Belam Singh & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 August 2026
Bench
Mini Pushkarnaauthor
Case no.
CONT.CAS(C) 1496/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

20.08.2026

¶1The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 20th January, 2026 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) 8122/2025, wherein, the petition was directed to be treated as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and it was directed that a speaking order be passed on the same with regard to reconstruction of the property bearing no. 1291 Phase I, Gautampuri Molarband, Mohan Coop. New Delhi-110044.

¶2The order dated 20th January, 2026, reads as under: "1. The petition has been filed for the following reliefs: This is a digitally signed order. "issue appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondent to grant permission to the petitioner to get reconstruction of the property no.1291 Phase I, Gautampuri Molarband, Mohan Coop. New Delhi-110044. b) Pass any such further order or orders as this Hon'bel court may deem fit and proper."

¶2It appears that no decision has been taken on the petitioner's request.

¶3In view thereof, respondent nos. 2 and 3 are directed to treat the instant petition to be a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to pass a speaking order within a period of two months from today.

¶4Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. If the petitioner, thereafter, has any grievance, he shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law."

¶3Issue notice.

¶4Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, who submits that hearing has already been granted to the petitioner, and a Speaking Order shall be passed within a period of two weeks, from today.

¶5The aforesaid statement is taken note of, and the respondents are held bound by the same.

¶6Let the requisite Speaking Order be passed by the respondents, within a period of two weeks, from today.

¶7In case, the respondents do not comply with the aforesaid timelines, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the present petition.

¶8Noting the aforesaid, the present petition, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 20, 2026/c This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010388112026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1496/2026 & CM APPL. 55892/2026 SH KALI CHARAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Singh with Mr. Manjeet, Advocates. (M): 9136171100 Email: manjeetadvocate1@gmail.com versus SH.BELAM SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi with Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms. Yashita Jain and Mr. Sahil Bhaskar, Advocates for DUSIB. (M): 9810473166 Email: ac10.adv@gmail.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.