VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Vasudeva Jewellers Pvt Ltd v. Kamlesh Rastogi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 November 2025
Bench
Anup Jairam Bhambhaniauthor
Case no.
RFA 809/2023

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.11.2025 CM APPL. 72297/2025 By way of the present application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 ('CPC'), the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal which has been settled in mediation vide Settlement Agreement dated

08.09.2025, a copy of which has been appended with the application.

¶2One of the terms of settlement is that the parties will withdraw all the proceedings pending between them respectively. The present appeal is listed at serial No. 10 of the table of pending cases between the parties that are to be withdrawn, as per Clause D of the settlement agreement.

¶3In the circumstances, Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal, submitting only that the parties be bound by the terms of the settlement agreement. This is a digitally signed order. RFA 809/2023

¶4Mr. Kashish Rastogi, the son of the respondent and also one of the signatories to the settlement agreement, has joined via video-conferencing; and confirms the submissions made by Mr. Lahoti.

¶5In view of the above, the application is allowed and stands disposed-of. RFA 809/2023

¶6In view of the above, the appeal is disposed-of as withdrawn, holding the parties bound by the terms of the settlement as comprised in the Settlement Agreement dated 08.09.2025.

¶7Pending application CM APPL. No. 50963/2023 also stands disposed-of. CM APPL. 72298/2025

¶8By way of the present application filed under section 151 CPC read with section 16 of the Court Fees Act 1870 read with section 89 CPC, the appellant seeks refund of court fees in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶9In view of the above, the application is allowed.

¶10Accordingly, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act 1870, the Registry is directed to refund the entire court fees affixed on the memo of appeal, to the appellant.

¶11The Registry is directed to draw-up the requisite certificate in favour of the appellant within 02 weeks.

¶12Application stands disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 ds This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

RFA 809/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 809/2023 M/S VASUDEVA JEWELLERS PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Divyakant Lahoti with Mr. Kartik Lahoti, Mr. Adith Menon and Mr. Shubheksha Dwivedi, Advocates. versus KAMLESH RASTOGI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.