VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Amardeep Singh & Ors v. The State Gnct of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Madhu Jainauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 6208/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2By the way of the present petition the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No. 662/2021, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, District Dwarka, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 451/354/323/506/34 of Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'), and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶3Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶4The petitioners and respondents nos. 2 and 3 are present before this The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. Court and have been duly identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer

(IO).

¶5Briefly stated, that FIR No. 662/2021 under Sections 451/354/323/506/34 IPC was registered at P.S. Uttam Nagar on the complaint of respondent No. 2, alleging that on 20.08.2021, the petitioners, along with others, entered her residence, assaulted her, outraged her modesty and threatened her family members. Upon completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against the petitioners. The matter is at the stage of prosecution evidence, with three out of seven witnesses having been examined. A cross-FIR No. 663/2021 under Sections 323/506/509/34 IPC was also registered against the complainant side, which was compounded vide order dated 28.06.2023.

¶6The parties amicably settled their disputes vide Settlement-cum-Compromise Deed dated 11.11.2022. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have affirmed that the settlement is voluntary and that they have no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶7On a query made by this Court, respondent nos. 2 & 3 who have been duly identified by the IO, have categorically stated that they have entered into a compromise, vide Settlement Agreement dated 11.11.2022, out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, respondents have no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

¶8In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. is no legal impediment to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶9Accordingly, FIR No. 662/2021, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, District Dwarka, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 451/354/323/506/34 of the IPC along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

¶10Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

¶11A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

¶12The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 24, 2026/JYH/PG The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010394732026 + CRL.M.C. 6208/2026 AMARDEEP SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sapna Goyal, Adv. with all the petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State Mr. Neeraj Dhaiya, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. SI Rohit, PS Uttam Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.